| Title |
Resuscitative strategies in traumatic hemorrhagic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-3-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrien Bouglé, Anatole Harrois, Jacques Duranteau |
| Abstract |
Managing trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock is complex and difficult. Despite our knowledge of the pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients that we have accumulated during recent decades, the mortality rate of these patients remains high. In the acute phase of hemorrhage, the therapeutic priority is to stop the bleeding as quickly as possible. As long as this bleeding is uncontrolled, the physician must maintain oxygen delivery to limit tissue hypoxia, inflammation, and organ dysfunction. This process involves fluid resuscitation, the use of vasopressors, and blood transfusion to prevent or correct acute coagulopathy of trauma. The optimal resuscitative strategy is controversial. To move forward, we need to establish optimal therapeutic approaches with clear objectives for fluid resuscitation, blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels to guide resuscitation and limit the risk of fluid overload and transfusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 10% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 37 | 9% |
| Other | 84 | 21% |
| Unknown | 87 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 237 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 92 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,120,515
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#266
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,108
of 295,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.