↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40663-021-00350-8
Authors

Baoming Du, Huawei Ji, Shirong Liu, Hongzhang Kang, Shan Yin, Chunjiang Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 31%
Environmental Science 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,174,053
of 22,489,892 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#169
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,952
of 422,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#31
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,489,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.