↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40663-021-00350-8
Authors

Baoming Du, Huawei Ji, Shirong Liu, Hongzhang Kang, Shan Yin, Chunjiang Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Environmental Science 5 29%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#268
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,494
of 431,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.