143 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: @TomasCajka Not sure about their statement “The values of R2 and Q2 are essential for the proper evaluation and robustness…
622 followers
Yes! and yet it is (one of, if not) the most used metric. I hope posters sessions in #metabolomics2023 will not be full of these...
338 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: @TomasCajka Not sure about their statement “The values of R2 and Q2 are essential for the proper evaluation and robustness…
4,470 followers
@TomasCajka Not sure about their statement “The values of R2 and Q2 are essential for the proper evaluation and robustness of the model obtained” actually for categorical modelling Q2 is awful. See https://t.co/J2dbZpW0Us
2,025 followers
"Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods for Determining the Geographical Origin of Raw Milk Using Vibrational Spectroscopy" https://t.co/dT8VVwFDQ1 https://t.co/Z43Z07O3ev\ https://t.co/E8dRisXKsa
5,699 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
978 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
5,699 followers
RT @JanStanstrup: I think we need to revisit this also this year... #metsoc2017 https://t.co/HAnuaIx1gF
210 followers
RT @JanStanstrup: I think we need to revisit this also this year... #metsoc2017 https://t.co/HAnuaIx1gF
819 followers
I think we need to revisit this also this year... #metsoc2017 https://t.co/HAnuaIx1gF
7,238 followers
@Nutrevolve @Peter_Aldiss @GeorgeMetsios This one highlights some of the problems re OPLSDA nicely: https://t.co/6KxprW7eQW
210 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
1,875 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
2,381 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
482 followers
RT @RoyGoodacre: Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.c…
4,470 followers
Q2 abuser alert! 0.1 is a good model! No No NO! Read: 'Assessment of PLSDA cross validation' in @metabolomics https://t.co/S5I6HsdVJJ
312 followers
RT @metabolomics: The runner up with >300 cites provides lessons on how to assess PLSDA with appropriate cross validation approaches: http:…
4,470 followers
RT @metabolomics: The runner up with >300 cites provides lessons on how to assess PLSDA with appropriate cross validation approaches: http:…
569 followers
RT @metabolomics: The runner up with >300 cites provides lessons on how to assess PLSDA with appropriate cross validation approaches: http:…
1,894 followers
RT @metabolomics: The runner up with >300 cites provides lessons on how to assess PLSDA with appropriate cross validation approaches: http:…
6,060 followers
The runner up with >300 cites provides lessons on how to assess PLSDA with appropriate cross validation approaches: http://t.co/qe5WqaoUcS
6,253 followers
RT @metabolomics: 1st place with 146 citations goes to Westerhuis JA et al. (2008) Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Vol 4, 81-89. http://t.co/Q1SoK8RA
6,060 followers
1st place with 146 citations goes to Westerhuis JA et al. (2008) Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Vol 4, 81-89. http://t.co/Q1SoK8RA