Title |
Efficacy and safety of IL-6 inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multicentre, randomized trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00941-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alessandro Belletti, Corrado Campochiaro, Marilena Marmiere, Valery Likhvantsev, Andrey Yavorovskiy, Lorenzo Dagna, Giovanni Landoni, Alberto Zangrillo, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
Italy | 3 | 19% |
France | 2 | 13% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 31% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,434,429
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#303
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,622
of 439,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.