↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing statistical parametric mapping analysis of 18F-FDG PET in children

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing statistical parametric mapping analysis of 18F-FDG PET in children
Published in
EJNMMI Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-219x-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederique Archambaud, Viviane Bouilleret, Lucie Hertz-Pannier, Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud, Sebastian Rodrigo, Olivier Dulac, Francine Chassoux, Catherine Chiron

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Neuroscience 7 18%
Engineering 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,613,944
of 14,656,415 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#171
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,293
of 254,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,656,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.