Title |
Human impact on fluvial systems in Europe with special regard to today’s river restorations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12302-021-00561-4 |
Authors |
Anna-Lisa Maaß, Holger Schüttrumpf, Frank Lehmkuhl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 22% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 5 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,083,698
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#229
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,320
of 426,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.