↓ Skip to main content

Fissure-first bilobectomy of a giant lung abscess combined with a squamous cell carcinoma via a minimally invasive open surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 396)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Fissure-first bilobectomy of a giant lung abscess combined with a squamous cell carcinoma via a minimally invasive open surgery
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01308-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suiha Uchiyama, Shuhei Iizuka, Toru Nakamura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,457,972
of 20,830,231 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#47
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,906
of 422,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#15
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,830,231 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.