↓ Skip to main content

Mars Dust Counter

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Mars Dust Counter
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/bf03352110
Authors

Eduard Igenbergs, Sho Sasaki, Ralf Münzenmayer, Hideo Ohashi, Georg Färber, Franz Fischer, Akira Fujiwara, Albrecht Glasmachers, Eberhard Grün, Yoshimi Hamabe, Heinrich Iglseder, Dieter Klinge, Hideaki Miyamoto, Tadashi Mukai, Walter Naumann, Ken-ichi Nogami, Gerhard Schwehm, Håkan Svedhem, Kazuo Yamakoshi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 31%
Physics and Astronomy 4 31%
Engineering 2 15%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,237,485
of 19,934,082 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#708
of 1,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,793
of 346,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,934,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them