↓ Skip to main content

Using Candida oleophila as a biocontriol agens to prevent foodborne Escherichia coli O157 EHEC infections

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Using Candida oleophila as a biocontriol agens to prevent foodborne Escherichia coli O157 EHEC infections
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-1-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujian Wang, An Wei, Hongyu Li

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 (EHEC O157) is a serious pathogen causing haemorrhagic colitis. In this study, inactivation kinetics of inoculated EHEC O157 and response of EHEC O157 in apple wounds by different concentrations of C. oleophila was investigated. The results presented in this study indicated that EHEC O157 could survive and grow in wounded 'Fuji' apples and extensively proliferate. Water as a decontaminant was ineffective in reducing EHEC O157 in wounded apples. C. oleophila could be a viable method of controlling wound contaminated by this pathogen at room temperature.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,325
of 280,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.