↓ Skip to main content

Long-term survival of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19: an observational cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Long-term survival of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19: an observational cohort study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00929-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar Peñuelas, Laura del Campo-Albendea, Amanda Lesmes González de Aledo, José Manuel Añón, Carmen Rodríguez-Solís, Jordi Mancebo, Paula Vera, Daniel Ballesteros, Jorge Jiménez, Emilio Maseda, Juan Carlos Figueira, Nieves Franco, Ángela Algaba, Juan Pablo Avilés, Ricardo Díaz, Beatriz Abad, Alfonso Canabal, Ana Abella, Federico Gordo, Javier García, Jessica García Suarez, Jamil Cedeño, Basilia Martínez-Palacios, Eva Manteiga, Óscar Martínez, Rafael Blancas, Tommaso Bardi, David Pestaña, José Ángel Lorente, Alfonso Muriel, Andrés Esteban, Fernando Frutos-Vivar

Abstract

Information is lacking regarding long-term survival and predictive factors for mortality in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to estimate 180-day mortality of patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive ventilation, and to develop a predictive model for long-term mortality. Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study between March 8 and April 30, 2020 in 16 intensive care units (ICU) in Spain. Participants were consecutive adults who received invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detected in positive testing of a nasopharyngeal sample and confirmed by real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR). The primary outcomes was 180-day survival after hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay, and ICU and in-hospital mortality. A predictive model was developed to estimate the probability of 180-day mortality. 868 patients were included (median age, 64 years [interquartile range [IQR], 56-71 years]; 72% male). Severity at ICU admission, estimated by SAPS3, was 56 points [IQR 50-63]. Prior to intubation, 26% received some type of noninvasive respiratory support. The unadjusted overall 180-day survival rates was 59% (95% CI 56-62%). The predictive factors measured during ICU stay, and associated with 180-day mortality were: age [Odds Ratio [OR] per 1-year increase 1.051, 95% CI 1.033-1.068)), SAPS3 (OR per 1-point increase 1.027, 95% CI 1.011-1.044), diabetes (OR 1.546, 95% CI 1.085-2.204), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (OR per 1-unit increase 1.008, 95% CI 1.001-1.016), failed attempt of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation prior to orotracheal intubation (OR 1.878 (95% CI 1.124-3.140), use of selective digestive decontamination strategy during ICU stay (OR 0.590 (95% CI 0.358-0.972) and administration of low dosage of corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg) (OR 2.042 (95% CI 1.205-3.460). The long-term survival of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 reaches more than 50% and may help to provide individualized risk stratification and potential treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04379258. Registered 10 April 2020 (retrospectively registered).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 4 4%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 53 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 55 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,100,718
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#122
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,622
of 437,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.