↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative determination of the lowest density domain in major fault zones via medical X-ray computed tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Quantitative determination of the lowest density domain in major fault zones via medical X-ray computed tomography
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40645-021-00442-7
Authors

Akiyuki Iwamori, Hideo Takagi, Nobutaka Asahi, Tatsuji Sugimori, Eiji Nakata, Shintaro Nohara, Keiichi Ueta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,070,896
of 22,172,124 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#207
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,348
of 350,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,172,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them