Title |
Effect of mechanical ventilation on intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients without other risk factors for abdominal hypertension: an observational multicenter epidemiological study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-2-s1-s22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caridad de Dios Soler Morejón, Teddy Osmin Tamargo Barbeito |
Abstract |
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is considered a predisposing factor for increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), especially when positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied or in the presence of auto-PEEP. So far, no prospective data exists on the effect of MV on IAP. The study aims to look on the effects of MV on IAP in a group of critically ill patients with no other risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 65% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,673,866
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#872
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,885
of 280,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.