Title |
A predictive indicator using lender composition for loan evaluation in P2P lending
|
---|---|
Published in |
Financial Innovation, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40854-021-00261-1 |
Authors |
Yanhong Guo, Shuai Jiang, Wenjun Zhou, Chunyu Luo, Hui Xiong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 23% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Energy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#90
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,515
of 443,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.