↓ Skip to main content

A new classification of congenital abnormalities of UPVS: sonographic appearances, screening strategy and clinical significance

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A new classification of congenital abnormalities of UPVS: sonographic appearances, screening strategy and clinical significance
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13244-021-01068-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Qin, Huaxuan Wen, Meiling Liang, Dandan Luo, Qing Zeng, Yimei Liao, Mengyu Zhang, Yan Ding, Xin Wen, Ying Tan, Ying Yuan, Shengli Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#12,423,211
of 19,476,606 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#471
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,826
of 336,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,476,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them