↓ Skip to main content

A conciliation mechanism for self-organizing dynamic small groups

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
A conciliation mechanism for self-organizing dynamic small groups
Published in
SpringerPlus, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2516-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minglun Ren, Zhongfeng Hu, Hemant Jain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 33 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 11%
Computer Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Design 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#509
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,826
of 354,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#73
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.