↓ Skip to main content

Sampling strategies for estimating forest cover from remote sensing-based two-stage inventories

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Sampling strategies for estimating forest cover from remote sensing-based two-stage inventories
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40663-015-0042-7
Authors

Piermaria Corona, Lorenzo Fattorini, Maria Chiara Pagliarella

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,042,915
of 21,689,971 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#70
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,659
of 340,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,689,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them