↓ Skip to main content

Paleoceanography and dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy across the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Subseries (Calabrian–Chibanian Stage) boundary at the Chiba composite section, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 435)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Paleoceanography and dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy across the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Subseries (Calabrian–Chibanian Stage) boundary at the Chiba composite section, Japan
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40645-021-00438-3
Authors

Eseroghene J. Balota, Martin J. Head, Makoto Okada, Yusuke Suganuma, Yuki Haneda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,528,490
of 19,391,192 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#32
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,902
of 333,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,391,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them