Black Hole information problem 2.0 Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/zsgSvoZgzM
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
RT @Nereide: @LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile:…
@LucaCiciriello @cristinamucciol 2/ Il gruppo AMPS pubblicò un paper, con cui pose i fisici di fronte ad una scelta difficile: accettare l'esistenza del firewall e con questo il crollo della Relativ. G., o accettare che l'informazione si perda nei B. N. e
Almheiri-Marolf-Polchinski-Sully 2013 #JHEP article "Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?" https://t.co/ekaFOqwgOC reaches 1,000 citations. #topcites @SpringerNature
[1207.3123] Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? BH information conservation and other physically natural assumptions are inconsistent. This results in firewall https://t.co/4rhThahund
RT @arXiv_trend: [+6][hep-th/1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Joseph Polchinski et al.: Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/u…
@NullAcc_2k14 @dustshoveller @ourMikeGeorge @wmarybeard @1812ann @chiggi You must be a man of great wisdom to be able to adjudicate academic disputes. What's your take on this one? https://t.co/pbWVulO6o8 Thank u
RT @arXiv_trend: [+4][hep-th/1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Joseph Polchinski et al.: Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/u…
RT @arXiv_trend: [+5][hep-th/1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Joseph Polchinski et al.: Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/u…
RT @arXiv_trend: [+4][hep-th/1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Joseph Polchinski et al.: Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/u…
For those wanting a deep dive https://t.co/RDB51rFe93 https://t.co/Qzb6WJKOFY
@quantum_graeme @Marco_Piani @GerardoAdesso is this another way to refute AMPS's monogamy --> firewalls argument? https://t.co/4WnAiXlvTg
[+7][hep-th/1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Joseph Polchinski et al., Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
[1207.3123] Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? https://t.co/gIfX8xBDoJ
#blackholes horizons are unapproachable, forbidding firewalls https://t.co/88hp759ro4, where time is spacelike https://t.co/LZXxWjzylW
About black holes: http://t.co/PilroZSoOj
(+3,hep-th)[1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf et al. : Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
(+3,hep-th)[1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf et al. : Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
(+3,hep-th)[1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf et al. : Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
(+3,hep-th)[1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf et al. : Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
(+3,hep-th)[1207.3123] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf et al. : Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/DG32u2zXUV
@NemAuChat JAY RETROUVE http://t.co/HePaQByWkx et http://t.co/HKNJmSk7Oo
「Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?」 ブラックホールのファイアウォール問題についての話題みたいだ http://t.co/QAXeUFc7xr
@GrumpyScientist didn't watch Newsnight, but I'm guess it's this http://t.co/kmLYU9Y1P4 and/or firewalls http://t.co/sVfhWsw2wP
Stephen Hawking:『ブラックホール存在しない』(http://t.co/DPg1E2LnqQ)夜3時に http://t.co/14kUAwAOse … これを読んでるって本当に重病だと思うけど物理面白い♡ 理論屋じゃないからちょっとわかりにくいかもしれないけど。。
Stephen Hawking『ブラックホール存在しない』。。。そろそろ夜3時に http://t.co/14kUAwAOse これを読んでるって本当に重病だと思うけど物理本当面白い♡ 理論屋じゃないからちょっとわかりにくいかもしれないけど。。。
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? by Polchinski (yesterday’s Physics Colloquium speaker) and co-workers is http://t.co/GJcyYaA7Kf
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
According to this author, don't fall into a black hole unless you want to burn up at the event horizon - http://t.co/3UwIQ79f7b
Excellent reason not to jump into a black hole: "the infalling observer burns up at the horizon." Details here: http://t.co/1hKAecJoQj
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
The black hole information paradox presents a sharp confict between quantum theory and general relativity... http://t.co/IXQfoifiRY
black hole horizon firewall AMPS: http://t.co/F6HMo9Ory3
I have no clue if the arguments hold - but "Black hole firewall" sounds cool http://t.co/zPnTp3l5sa
"Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? (v4) We have not changed our minds" by Polchinski et al http://t.co/KZpXq3jtOv
Observers falling through an event horizon may actually be incinerated by a firewall! http://t.co/P4BihbtQKx http://t.co/uQDWCIj5fs
@JakeHowell9 not exactly what I was talking about, but here's something: http://t.co/xadCS0jQ, + a video http://t.co/PXSXCYh3
#StringTheory #fail "most conservative resolution is that the infalling observer burns up at horizon" RT @FerLabarga http://t.co/kQ8B2R4W
According to Peter Woit, the next coolest thing in physics: http://t.co/1z0L0Kor
Re: neat work on black holes & firewalls, discussed yesterday MT @partialobs: See http://t.co/OGIqL6Ga and references therein.
@Fooly_Cooly ¿Has leído a Polchinski y Susskind sobre "firewalls" en agujeros negros?Muy curioso http://t.co/qkoG7x1t y http://t.co/6oT4lguc
That upon entering a blackhole you encounter a "firewall" if you may at horizon level.. Here.. Read http://t.co/yRE2Fsyj
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? http://t.co/BwbM1yus
#SpFF 2/2 "or information is loss." In "Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?" Joseph Polchinski et al = http://t.co/qkoG7x1t
Falling into a black hole? Looks like you'll be toast before you reach the event horizon - http://t.co/lqDDXJkb
“@sc_k: Interesting #ToRead: "Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?" http://t.co/PTjSpb8g”
Interesting #ToRead: "Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?" http://t.co/nw0EzeEt
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?. (arXiv:1207.3123v1 [hep-th]): We argue that the ... http://t.co/ibDcGXki #physics #cosmology