↓ Skip to main content

External lysis of Escherichia coli by a bacteriophage endolysin modified with hydrophobic amino acids

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent


22 Dimensions

Readers on

63 Mendeley
External lysis of Escherichia coli by a bacteriophage endolysin modified with hydrophobic amino acids
Published in
AMB Express, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13568-019-0838-x
Pubmed ID

Guangmou Yan, Rui Yang, Kejia Fan, Hanlin Dong, Chencheng Gao, Shuang Wang, Ling Yu, Zhe Cheng, Liancheng Lei

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
of 20,793,985 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 338,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,793,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them