| Title |
Axillary lymphadenopathy at the time of COVID-19 vaccination: ten recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-021-01062-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Schiaffino, Katja Pinker, Veronica Magni, Andrea Cozzi, Alexandra Athanasiou, Pascal A. T. Baltzer, Julia Camps Herrero, Paola Clauser, Eva M. Fallenberg, Gábor Forrai, Michael H. Fuchsjäger, Thomas H. Helbich, Fleur Kilburn-Toppin, Christiane K. Kuhl, Mihai Lesaru, Ritse M. Mann, Pietro Panizza, Federica Pediconi, Ruud M. Pijnappel, Tamar Sella, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Sophia Zackrisson, Fiona J. Gilbert, Francesco Sardanelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 12 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 66 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 93% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#640,957
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#15
of 1,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,773
of 438,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.