↓ Skip to main content

Stapling of an endobronchial suction tube with the bronchus during robot-assisted right lower lobectomy: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Stapling of an endobronchial suction tube with the bronchus during robot-assisted right lower lobectomy: a case report
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01278-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroto Tanaka, Teruhiro Aoki, Makoto Oda, Yoshimasa Inoue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,025,659
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#69
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,733
of 430,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.