↓ Skip to main content

Reply to: Comment on: “Using Field Based Data to Model Sprint Track Cycling Performance”

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine - Open, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Reply to: Comment on: “Using Field Based Data to Model Sprint Track Cycling Performance”
Published in
Sports Medicine - Open, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40798-021-00351-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamish Ferguson, Chris Harnish, Geoff Chase

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,226,909
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#388
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,928
of 430,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.