↓ Skip to main content

Gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill immunocompromised patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill immunocompromised patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00913-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Catano, Sophie Caroline Sacleux, Jean-Marc Gornet, Marine Camus, Naike Bigé, Faouzi Saliba, Elie Azoulay, Guillaume Dumas, Lara Zafrani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,687,851
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#700
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,872
of 423,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.