↓ Skip to main content

Why do consumers respond to eco-labels? The case of Korea

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Why do consumers respond to eco-labels? The case of Korea
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3550-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Ah Hwang, Youkyoung Park, Yeonbae Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 21%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#509
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,742
of 312,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#39
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.