↓ Skip to main content

Monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR but not β-d-glucan may help early diagnosing invasive Candida infection in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR but not β-d-glucan may help early diagnosing invasive Candida infection in critically ill patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00918-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boris Jung, Clément Le Bihan, Pierre Portales, Nathalie Bourgeois, Thierry Vincent, Laurence Lachaud, Gerald Chanques, Matthieu Conseil, Philippe Corne, Pablo Massanet, Jean François Timsit, Samir Jaber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,121,765
of 24,614,554 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#747
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,302
of 422,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,614,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.