| Title |
Case fatality inequalities of critically ill COVID-19 patients according to patient-, hospital- and region-related factors: a French nationwide study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00915-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Guillon, Emeline Laurent, Antoine Duclos, Lucile Godillon, Pierre-François Dequin, Nelly Agrinier, Antoine Kimmoun, Leslie Grammatico-Guillon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 18 | 29% |
| France | 6 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 6% |
| Cuba | 2 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Yemen | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,017,462
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#113
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,410
of 438,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.