↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 892)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00916-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Decamps, Nicolas Grillot, Aurelie Le Thuaut, Noelle Brule, Corinne Lejus-Bourdeau, Jean Reignier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#164,133
of 19,315,352 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,925
of 336,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,315,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them