↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution flow simulation in Typhoon 21, 2018: massive loss of submerged macrophytes in Lake Biwa

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
High-resolution flow simulation in Typhoon 21, 2018: massive loss of submerged macrophytes in Lake Biwa
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40645-021-00440-9
Authors

Satoshi Nakada, Hiroki Haga, Maho Iwaki, Kohji Mabuchi, Noriko Takamura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,706,109
of 20,275,020 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#334
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,877
of 340,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,275,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them