↓ Skip to main content

On the conditions for valid objective functions in blind separation of independent and dependent sources

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
On the conditions for valid objective functions in blind separation of independent and dependent sources
Published in
ADS, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-255
Authors

Cesar F Caiafa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 58%
Materials Science 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#24,242
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,131
of 286,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#492
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.