↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission in two university hospitals in the Netherlands: the danger of delayed ICU admissions and off-hour triage decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission in two university hospitals in the Netherlands: the danger of delayed ICU admissions and off-hour triage decisions
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00898-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther N. van der Zee, Dominique D. Benoit, Marinus Hazenbroek, Jan Bakker, Erwin J. O. Kompanje, Nuray Kusadasi, Jelle L. Epker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 43%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Psychology 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,198,574
of 19,237,454 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#495
of 889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,127
of 333,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,237,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.