↓ Skip to main content

Scaffold strategies combined with mesenchymal stem cells in vaginal construction: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Scaffold strategies combined with mesenchymal stem cells in vaginal construction: a review
Published in
Cell Regeneration, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13619-021-00088-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Andréa Corbellini Henckes, Dalana Faleiro, Laura Chao Chuang, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima

Abstract

Tissue engineering has provided new treatment alternatives for tissue reconstruction. Advances in the tissue engineering field have resulted in mechanical support and biological substitutes to restore, maintain or improve tissue/organs structures and functions. The application of tissue engineering technology in the vaginal reconstruction treatment can not only provide mechanical requirements, but also offer tissue repairing as an alternative to traditional approaches. In this review, we discuss recent advances in cell-based therapy in combination with scaffolds strategies that can potentially be adopted for gynaecological transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#20,509,903
of 25,204,906 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#132
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,784
of 426,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.