↓ Skip to main content

Autism Prevalence Following Prenatal Exposure to Hurricanes and Tropical Storms in Louisiana

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Autism Prevalence Following Prenatal Exposure to Hurricanes and Tropical Storms in Louisiana
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0414-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis K. Kinney, Andrea M. Miller, David J. Crowley, Emerald Huang, Erika Gerber

Abstract

Hurricanes and tropical storms served as natural experiments for investigating whether autism is associated with exposure to stressful events during sensitive periods of gestation. Weather service data identified severe storms in Louisiana from 1980 to 1995 and parishes hit by storm centers during this period. Autism prevalences in different cohorts were calculated using anonymous data on birth dates and parishes of children diagnosed with autism in the state mental health system, together with corresponding census data on all live births in Louisiana. Prevalence increased in dose-response fashion with severity of prenatal storm exposure, especially for cohorts exposed near the middle or end of gestation (p < 0.001). Results complement other evidence that factors disrupting development during sensitive gestational periods may contribute to autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 254 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 20%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Neuroscience 24 9%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,868,142
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#789
of 5,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,555
of 71,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.