| Title |
Lithostratigraphic units of the Helvetic Palaeogene: review, new definition, new classification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00015-016-0217-4 |
| Authors |
Ursula Menkveld-Gfeller, Oliver Kempf, Hanspeter Funk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 27% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#58
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,727
of 360,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.