↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00906-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enzo Lüsebrink, Alexander Krogmann, Franziska Tietz, Matthias Riebisch, Rainer Okrojek, Friedhelm Peltz, Carsten Skurk, Carsten Hullermann, Jan Sackarnd, Dietmar Wassilowsky, Karl Toischer, Clemens Scherer, Michael Preusch, Christoph Testori, Ulrike Flierl, Sven Peterss, Sabine Hoffmann, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Christian Hagl, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Peter Luedike, Tienush Rassaf, Holger Thiele, Andreas Schäfer, Martin Orban, Stefan Kääb, Stefan Brunner, Mathias Orban, Tobias Petzold, Saliha Kehar, Sara Würbel, Hans-Joachim Stemmler, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Jan Kleeberger, Antonia Kellnar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Librarian 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,560,749
of 19,467,557 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#170
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,685
of 335,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,467,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them