| Title |
Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00906-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enzo Lüsebrink, Alexander Krogmann, Franziska Tietz, Matthias Riebisch, Rainer Okrojek, Friedhelm Peltz, Carsten Skurk, Carsten Hullermann, Jan Sackarnd, Dietmar Wassilowsky, Karl Toischer, Clemens Scherer, Michael Preusch, Christoph Testori, Ulrike Flierl, Sven Peterss, Sabine Hoffmann, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Christian Hagl, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Peter Luedike, Tienush Rassaf, Holger Thiele, Andreas Schäfer, Martin Orban |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 15% |
| Germany | 3 | 12% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,462,025
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#166
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,809
of 426,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.