↓ Skip to main content

Improving health benefits with considering traditional and modern health benefits of Peganum harmala

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Improving health benefits with considering traditional and modern health benefits of Peganum harmala
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40816-021-00255-7
Authors

Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian, Wenli Sun, Qi Cheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#12,283,153
of 18,694,771 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#19
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,157
of 256,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,694,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them