Title |
Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4 |
Authors |
Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Sweden | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 120 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Librarian | 14 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
Other | 36 | 26% |
Unknown | 14 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 42 | 30% |
Computer Science | 30 | 22% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
Engineering | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,763,072
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#910
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,820
of 288,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.