Title |
Adverse Drug Events Occurring Following Hospital Discharge
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2005
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.30390.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan J. Forster, Harvey J. Murff, Josh F. Peterson, Tejal K. Gandhi, David W. Bates |
Abstract |
To describe the incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs), preventable ADEs, and ameliorable ADEs occurring after hospital discharge and their associated risk factors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 5 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 205 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
Researcher | 28 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
Other | 59 | 27% |
Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 45% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Engineering | 7 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 6% |
Unknown | 50 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#805,532
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#643
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,089
of 85,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.