↓ Skip to main content

Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Letters, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
Title
Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance
Published in
Biotechnology Letters, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10529-010-0347-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olubukola Oluranti Babalola

Abstract

The rhizosphere is the soil-plant root interphase and in practice consists of the soil adhering to the root besides the loose soil surrounding it. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are potential agents for the biological control of plant pathogens. A biocontrol strain should be able to protect the host plant from pathogens and fulfill the requirement for strong colonization. Numerous compounds that are toxic to pathogens, such as HCN, phenazines, pyrrolnitrin, and pyoluteorin as well as, other enzymes, antibiotics, metabolites and phytohormones are the means by which PGPR act, just as quorum sensing and chemotaxis which are vital for rhizosphere competence and colonization. The presence of root exudates has a pronounced effect on the rhizosphere where they serve as an energy source, promoting growth and influencing the root system for the rhizobacteria. In certain instances they have products that inhibit the growth of soil-borne pathogens to the advantage of the plant root. A major source of concern is reproducibility in the field due to the complex interaction between the plant (plant species), microbe and the environment (soil fertility and moisture, day length, light intensity, length of growing season, and temperature). This review listed most of the documented PGPR genera and discussed their exploitation.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 380 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 19%
Researcher 61 15%
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 9%
Other 84 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 246 62%
Unspecified 46 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 10%
Environmental Science 33 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 3%
Other 22 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,884,354
of 13,260,816 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Letters
#110
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,985
of 248,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Letters
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,260,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.