↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based phytotherapy in allergic rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based phytotherapy in allergic rhinitis
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40816-018-0080-0
Authors

Vladimir Kozlov, Galina Lavrenova, Elena Savlevich, Kira Bazarkina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,406,066
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#18
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,024
of 331,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.