@mrbgilson @NarelleLyn Found the source: https://t.co/gtGq2i86Yh
RT @grisagregorio: Artigo que pode interessar a vocês: @sargiani @augustobuch. Recorte de idade (4 e 5 anos) parece ser bem importante aqui…
Artigo que pode interessar a vocês: @sargiani @augustobuch. Recorte de idade (4 e 5 anos) parece ser bem importante aqui: https://t.co/4fWjsomJLZ
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
RT @BrimbleGaynor: Am still surprised that anyone would think that learning to read & write needs a phonic approach only. And still they tr…
RT @BrimbleGaynor: Am still surprised that anyone would think that learning to read & write needs a phonic approach only. And still they tr…
RT @BrimbleGaynor: Am still surprised that anyone would think that learning to read & write needs a phonic approach only. And still they tr…
This.... @shinpad1 @GalwayMr https://t.co/wRYATYl8Qq
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
Am still surprised that anyone would think that learning to read & write needs a phonic approach only. And still they try ...🤔 https://t.co/tvXdi7dcBb
RT @DavidWray: Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1h…
Evidence in favour of a multi-method approach to early reading. Phonics only does not seem to be the answer. https://t.co/1hip3b6xGZ
RT @bentleykarl: Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with a Mixed Approach to Teaching R…
RT @bentleykarl: Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with a Mixed Approach to Teaching R…
Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with a Mixed Approach to Teaching Reading to 4–5 Year-Old Children (Ruth Price-Mohr and Colin Price, 2016) https://t.co/cLsewzL3cT
Free article! Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with a ......https://t.co/YeCwC01kAg
RT @SpringerEdu: Free access! Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only ...... https://t.co/pE…
Free access! Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only ...... https://t.co/pEsAz9ahVi
RT @SpringerEdu: Free access! Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with...... https://t.c…
Free access! Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with...... https://t.co/pEsAz9ahVi