↓ Skip to main content

Stem/progenitor cells in fetuses and newborns: overview of immunohistochemical markers

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 135)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Stem/progenitor cells in fetuses and newborns: overview of immunohistochemical markers
Published in
Cell Regeneration, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13619-021-00084-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Fanni, C. Gerosa, C. Loddo, M. Castagnola, V. Fanos, M. Zaffanello, G. Faa

Abstract

Microanatomy of the vast majority of human organs at birth is characterized by marked differences as compared to adult organs, regarding their architecture and the cell types detectable at histology. In preterm neonates, these differences are even more evident, due to the lower level of organ maturation and to ongoing cell differentiation. One of the most remarkable finding in preterm tissues is the presence of huge amounts of stem/progenitor cells in multiple organs, including kidney, brain, heart, adrenals, and lungs. In other organs, such as liver, the completely different burden of cell types in preterm infants is mainly related to the different function of the liver during gestation, mainly focused on hematopoiesis, a function that is taken by bone marrow after birth. Our preliminary studies showed that the antigens expressed by stem/progenitors differ significantly from one organ to the next. Moreover, within each developing human tissue, reactivity for different stem cell markers also changes during gestation, according with the multiple differentiation steps encountered by each progenitor during development. A better knowledge of stem/progenitor cells of preterms will allow neonatologists to boost preterm organ maturation, favoring the differentiation of the multiple cells types that characterize each organ in at term neonates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,402,242
of 21,907,648 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#47
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,283
of 341,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,907,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them