↓ Skip to main content

Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools
Published in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11412-008-9037-5
Authors

Jürgen Buder, Daniel Bodemer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 84 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 30%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 31%
Computer Science 19 19%
Psychology 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#193
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,172
of 80,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.