| Title |
Risk factors for adverse outcomes during mechanical ventilation of 1152 COVID-19 patients: a multicenter machine learning study with highly granular data from the Dutch Data Warehouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-021-00397-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas M. Fleuren, Michele Tonutti, Daan P. de Bruin, Robbert C. A. Lalisang, Tariq A. Dam, Diederik Gommers, Olaf L. Cremer, Rob J. Bosman, Sebastiaan J. J. Vonk, Mattia Fornasa, Tomas Machado, Nardo J. M. van der Meer, Sander Rigter, Evert-Jan Wils, Tim Frenzel, Dave A. Dongelmans, Remko de Jong, Marco Peters, Marlijn J. A. Kamps, Dharmanand Ramnarain, Ralph Nowitzky, Fleur G. C. A. Nooteboom, Wouter de Ruijter, Louise C. Urlings-Strop, Ellen G. M. Smit, D. Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper, Tom Dormans, Cornelis P. C. de Jager, Stefaan H. A. Hendriks, Evelien Oostdijk, Auke C. Reidinga, Barbara Festen-Spanjer, Gert Brunnekreef, Alexander D. Cornet, Walter van den Tempel, Age D. Boelens, Peter Koetsier, Judith Lens, Sefanja Achterberg, Harald J. Faber, A. Karakus, Menno Beukema, Robert Entjes, Paul de Jong, Taco Houwert, Hidde Hovenkamp, Roberto Noorduijn Londono, Davide Quintarelli, Martijn G. Scholtemeijer, Aletta A. de Beer, Giovanni Cinà, Martijn Beudel, Nicolet F. de Keizer, Mark Hoogendoorn, Armand R. J. Girbes, Willem E. Herter, Paul W. G. Elbers, Patrick J. Thoral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Argentina | 4 | 9% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
| Engineering | 8 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,303,697
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#24
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,429
of 432,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.