↓ Skip to main content

Humanitarian support in a denial of access context: emergent strategies at the interface of humanitarian and sovereign law

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Humanitarian support in a denial of access context: emergent strategies at the interface of humanitarian and sovereign law
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41018-021-00103-w
Authors

Erwin Biersteker, Julie Ferguson, Peter Groenewegen, Kees Boersma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#99
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,741
of 446,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.