↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for smarter catchment hydrology models: incorporating scaling and better process representation

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for smarter catchment hydrology models: incorporating scaling and better process representation
Published in
Geoscience Letters, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40562-021-00193-9
Authors

Roy C. Sidle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 20%
Engineering 16 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#119
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,037
of 443,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.