↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory and sleep disorders in mucopolysaccharidosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory and sleep disorders in mucopolysaccharidosis
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10545-012-9555-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth I. Berger, Simone C. Fagondes, Roberto Giugliani, Karen A. Hardy, Kuo Sheng Lee, Ciarán McArdle, Maurizio Scarpa, Martin J. Tobin, Susan A. Ward, David M. Rapoport

Abstract

MPS encompasses a group of rare lysosomal storage disorders that are associated with the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) in organs and tissues. This accumulation can lead to the progressive development of a variety of clinical manifestations. Ear, nose, throat (ENT) and respiratory problems are very common in patients with MPS and are often among the first symptoms to appear. Typical features of MPS include upper and lower airway obstruction and restrictive pulmonary disease, which can lead to chronic rhinosinusitis or chronic ear infections, recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract infections, obstructive sleep apnoea, impaired exercise tolerance, and respiratory failure. This review provides a detailed overview of the ENT and respiratory manifestations that can occur in patients with MPS and discusses the issues related to their evaluation and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 12%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 30 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 33 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,155,634
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1,355
of 1,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,112
of 178,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.