↓ Skip to main content

Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans
Published in
Animal Cognition, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0022-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley R. Sturz, Kent D. Bodily, Jeffrey S. Katz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 10%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 32 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Unspecified 5 12%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,388,898
of 8,255,097 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#584
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,815
of 253,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,255,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.