↓ Skip to main content

Perceived benefits of marathon running in males and females

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, August 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Perceived benefits of marathon running in males and females
Published in
Sex Roles, August 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00289849
Authors

Susan G. Ziegler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 9 33%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,269,564
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,467
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,818
of 17,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.