↓ Skip to main content

Special issue, “Kurile arc subduction zone: View of great earthquake generation and disaster mitigation of related phenomena”

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Special issue, “Kurile arc subduction zone: View of great earthquake generation and disaster mitigation of related phenomena”
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40623-021-01439-8
Authors

Yuichiro Tanioka, Naoki Uchida, Aditya Riadi Gusman, Masanobu Shishikura, Takuya Nishimura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%
Psychology 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,052,752
of 22,541,222 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#608
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,126
of 350,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,541,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them