↓ Skip to main content

Identification of antibacterial peptides from endophytic microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Identification of antibacterial peptides from endophytic microbiome
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00253-016-7765-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. V. Tejesvi, P. Picart, M. Kajula, H. Hautajärvi, L. Ruddock, H.H. Kristensen, A. Tossi, H.G. Sahl, S. Ek, S. Mattila, A. M. Pirttilä

Abstract

Endophytes, microorganisms living inside plant tissues, are promising producers of lead compounds for the pharmaceutical industry. However, the majority of endophytes are unculturable and therefore inaccessible for functional studies. To evaluate genetic resources of endophytes, we analyzed the biodiversity of fungal microbiome of black crowberry (Empetrum nigrum L.) by next-generation sequencing and found that it consists mainly of unknown taxa. We then separated the host and the endophyte genomes and constructed a fosmid expression library from the endophytic DNA. This library was screened for antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. A unique antibacterial clone was selected for further analysis, and a gene En-AP1 was identified with no similarity to known sequences. The expressed, folded protein En-AP1 was not active against S. aureus, while tryptic digests exhibited antimicrobial activity. Seven out of twelve synthesized peptides, predicted antibacterial in silico, exhibited in vitro activity towards both S. aureus and Escherichia coli. We propose that the En-AP1 protein is degraded in the library host E. coli and antimicrobial fragments are released from the cell, explaining the in vitro antibacterial activity of the clone. This is the first report of a novel gene expressed in vitro derived from an endophytic microbiome, demonstrating the potential of finding novel genes and compounds from unculturable endophytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Unspecified 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,105,592
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,242
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,851
of 349,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#40
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.